To the editor:
Durham Regional council has gone to considerable lengths to find that we can afford an incinerator, but should we have one?
The British Society for Ecological Medicine concluded in December 2005 that because of the medical risks, no further incinerators should be built.
Incinerators produce a range of poisonous chemicals that include dioxins. These exist in particles so small that they pass right through our lungs into our bloodstreams. They are known causes of birth defects, leukemia, cancers and heart disease and cannot be destroyed by further incineration.
Those in favour of incineration talk a lot about monitoring dioxin levels as if low levels remove all risk, but they do not:
1) Amounts leaving by the chimney can only be reduced by leaving more in the ash which is dumped into landfills where it remains a toxic hazard for at least 100 years.
2) Although less dioxins released into the air is certainly safer than more, the truth is that even the smallest amount will cause some of the medical problems mentioned. It is also difficult to get consistent and reliable readings.
True monitoring will involve checking birth certificates (for abnormalities) and death certificates and will become a provincial matter.
Dr. Gerald Baker
Whitby
Recommend :
More Letters
We must look beyond nuclear energy for other optionsTo the editor: Now that the provincial government has put the Darlington nuclear new build on hold indefinitely, it is time to reconsider the massive subsidies that have been...
Taxes in Oshawa are too highTo the editor: When are the people of Oshawa going to stand up against the council and fight the taxes in Oshawa? I live in a 1100 sq. ft. home in north Oshawa and my taxes...
American finds column out of lineTo the editor:Re: Say it loud and say it proud: I just love being a Canadian, Dirk van der Werf column, July 1. As an American in Ajax, I am continually amused and confused by...
Incinerator should have been voted downTo the editor: Friday, June 26, 2009, was a black day for the residents of Clarington. All three Clarington Regional councillors voted in favour of an incinerator in...
We need a zero per cent increase in 2010To the editor:Re: Clarington 2010 budget already raising angst, June 19. After reading Jennifer Stone's excellent article on Clarington budget problems for next year it...
Incineration is best option for nowTo the editor: I don't see another viable option for disposing of residual waste other than through incineration. The zero waste solution being pushed by some is...
Bicyclists should be more considerateTo the editor:Re: Stop bike riders from rolling on sidewalks, Arnaldo Beni letter, June 26. I often hear bike riders saying how car drivers are inconsiderate. This is the pot...
Bicyclists need place to ride, tooTo the editor:Re: Stop bike riders from rolling on sidewalks, Arnaldo Beni letter, June 26. I also have a pet peeve: Every time I place my feet upon my bike pedals I almost...
Oshawa needs bike-friendly areasTo the editor:Re: Stop bike riders from rolling on sidewalks, Arnaldo Beni letter, June 26. I make it a point to follow the rules of the road. I like to treat those who share...
Council had no mandate to build incineratorTo the editor: At the June 16 and 24 meetings of Durham Regional council, approximately 140 delegations, including Clarington medical doctors, a physicist, a United Church...